Monica Pignotti: Judge, Jury, and Executioner?

This screenshot is from one of the numerous blogs maintained by Monica Pignotti.

She is alluding to scattershot questions asked of a pair of therapists offering a workshop on aggression. Pignotti holds no academic position, is not currently a practicing mental health professional, and does, therefore, have no right to demand answers. The logical thing for her to do might be to contact these people.

But read what she has written closely. Pignotti claims that 47 people are somehow helping her “end the days” of this unresponsive individual.

Isn’t that a bit severe?

Pignotti, when it suits her, extols critical thinking and claims to be an expert in the field. It would appear she is an impatient person. Rather than wait for answers to her question, she has made up her mind: this person must be eliminated. She does not call for anything less drastic, she goes straight to a terminal solution.

This is hardly what one would expect from the “Ralph Nader of Psychotherapy” which is how she described herself to an adoption discussion group.

Monica Pignotti is a former Scientologist, a cult known for violence and deception. One hopes that Pignotti is not enforcing some bit of Scientology doctrine here…

Leave a Comment

Filed under conspiracy theory, defamation, emily rosa, jean mercer, larry sarner, linda rosa, monica pignotti, quackery, roger callahan, scientology, thought field therapy

Monica Pignotti: Google “Has Her Number”

Google is wise. Very wise.

When it encounters the name “Monica Pignotti” is selects advertisements for things with which she is closely associated. In this example, Google, quite correctly, chose EFT tapping and Scientology.

Pignotti, a former Scientologist, began a shaky career as “debunker” by writing about her experiences in Scientology.

Some time after that, she became a devotee and practitioner of yet another questionable practice, Roger Callahan’s Thought Field Therapy and Voice Technology.

She abandoned them and used her inside knowledge to write a scathing critique.

To her inevitable chagrin, Google does not select things like:

  1. Jean Mercer’s now cancelled blog on Psychology Today
  2. Marolyn Morford
  3. The Evidence-Based Clearinghouse
  4. Project DoD
  5. Tiffany Rad
  6. Larry Sarner’s voting machine designs
  7. Michael and Joye Anestis

No, Google chose EFT and Scientology. It is, however, interesting that given the unredacted (redaction was done to forestall complaints of defamation) content, that Doctor Who ads were not  selected as well!

Leave a Comment

Filed under charly d. miller, google, jean mercer, larry sarner, linda rosa, monica pignotti, roger callahan, scientology, time travel

Jean Mercer: Her Blog Reveals Disturbing Motivations

Jean Mercer has a blog called “child myths” on Psychology Today.

By way of introduction, Jean Mercer earned a Ph.D. in psychology from Brandeis University. For unknown reasons, she failed to obtain a clinical license.

That means she has never seen a patient. Her entire professional career has been as an academic.

One of her blog posts, though, reveals that she was consulted in a case where a woman gave birth the baby was asphyxiated. Where is Mercer’s expertise?

Was this an improper consultation? Not only does Mercer lack clinical experience, this would appear to be a question of physiology, rather than psychology.

Several recent posts attack independent therapeutic practices. Once again, this is an area Mercer has no experience in. In one case, she based her attack on a promotional email, and went so far as to admit that her data was incomplete.

This did not stop Mercer from going forward, though.

What motivates Jean Mercer to attack clinicians?

Some of Mercer’s co-authors have “interesting” backgrounds.

Monica Pignotti spent years at the highest levels of Scientology, and was involved with one of the sons of Scientology founder, L. Ron Hubbard. After leaving Scientology, Pignotti became a practitioner of Roger Callahan‘s “thought field therapy” and “voice technology.” After abandoning those, she turned to academia.

Pignotti has denied involvement in defamation litigation. Unfortunately for her, the existence of at least one defamation lawsuit is very well documented.

Pignotti spends a great deal of time in an Internet Scientology discussion group. She has said many bizarre things, such as stating that she wished the Internet had never been invented!

Larry Sarner has been described as a mathematician and inventor. The only “inventions” associated with him are voting machines. These voting machines did not work, and Sarner bilked both lenders and investors out of over a million dollars. Sarner was taken to court, where he lost. Sarner drafted his own appeal, which consisted of a fantastic conspiracy theory. The court refused to hear this argument. As a result, Sarner and his wife, Linda Rosa, went into bankruptcy.

Larry Sarner is said to hold bachelor’s degrees in mathematics and political science. These degrees would not qualify him for medical licensure, but he tries to give the impression that he is an expert on therapeutic methods.

Sarner also claims to be a “key figure” in the skeptical community. A close review of the situation, though, reveals quite the opposite.

Leave a Comment

Filed under conspiracy theory, defamation, jean mercer, larry sarner, linda rosa, monica pignotti, roger callahan, scientology

Larry Sarner: Not a Scientist

From time to time, it is claimed that Larry Sarner is a mathematician, specifically a cryptographer.

The only evidence of his participation in anything even remotely related to these fields was his attempt at inventing voting machines.

The machines did not work, and his investors lost money.

Since then, he has taken to writing blogs criticizing therapies he is not qualified to evaluate and alienating others in the skeptical community.

Leave a Comment

Filed under larry sarner

Monica Pignotti Replies…

This is from a debate on a Scientology-related newsgroup. Monica Pignotti was asked what is “not quackery” and here is the question and answer…

“> HeyMonica!!!

> You keep griping and sniping at all these ‘quackery’ methods, but you
> never say anything about what you believe to NOT be quackery.

> HeyMonica!!!

> What is not quackery to you???

I have said plenty about it in my dissertation and elsewhere. Have you
ever heard of Evidence-Based Practice and Empirically Supported
Therapies? Google it before you jump to false conclusions, but that’s
what you do, isn’t it. You jump to highly premature conclusions based
on little evidence when my track record of scholarship shows that I
have published on what constitutes evidence. Contrary to your libelous
and defamatory ads, my dissertation was on The use of Novel
Unsupported and Empirically Supported Treatments by Licensed Clinical
Social Workers. Nothing to do with “blinker cats” which aren’t even a
real Scientology belief, much less anything I have ever believed, much
less done a dissertation on.
In the professional world, there are standards for evidence, such as
the APA criteria for empirical support, which is what I went by for my
dissertation. Hint: the quack attachment therapies you defend are not
on the list, not even close.
Oh and by the way, your efforts to take down A Search for Survivors
have failed utterly:
http://childtorture.wordpress.com/
Monica”

The last statement appears to be untrue. That blog has, at some point, been suspended by WordPress.

1 Comment

Filed under monica pignotti, quackery, scientology